Lifeline News brought to you by International Safety Systems Inc.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Product Highlight: Black Widow Grip Gloves


Here is a little information on the latest product released from Superior Gloves. They're called the the Black Widow Grip Series because "Micropore technology provides spider-like grip in
wet/oily conditions".

There are two versions; one with Kevlar knit and one with Nylon knit which are dipped in a black nitrile coating.

Have a look here for more information.

Part numbers and descriptions are below.

S13PNT - Dexterity™ Series, 13-gauge black nylon glove with micropore-nitrile-grip palm coating, Sizes: 6-10

S13KPNT - Dexterity™ Series, 13-gauge Kevlar® glove with micropore-nitrile-grip palm coating, Sizes: 7-11

Call us or email us for samples, more information or pricing.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Honeywell's Shopping Spree; Sperian Up Next



After buying North Safety just a couple years ago (major player in the H&S world), Honeywell is about to buy Sperian Protection which itself had just acquired Bacou-Dalloz not too long ago. The price tag: $1.4 Billion.

Both companies have very robust product lines offering total PPE lines. This will certainly put them in a good position as they can cut weaker lines and move forward with their competitor's line. I'm interested to see what will happen though with good products that overlap. Most notably; both North (Honeywell) and Miller (Sperian) are very strong Fall Protection Brands. The two have quite a few very well designed products and have a lot of end-users with brand loyalty that may end up disappointed. Only time will tell I guess. Have a look at Honeywell's press release for the total story.

I wonder if 3M has heard about this...

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Ontario MoL: FALL PROTECTION 'BLITZ'

The Ontario Ministry of Labour has released the preliminary results of their 'Heightened Enforcement Campaign on Fall-Related Hazards in the Construction Industry'. It's is a pretty interesting report for people concerned with Fall Protection in Ontario and throughout Canada. It gives some good insight and provides some historical data as well as current stats on the current state of the compliance.

Have a look here.

Friday, May 14, 2010

H&S; We still have a lot of work to do

Construction sites rife with fall hazards, review finds

May 14, 2010

Tanya Talaga

{{GA_Article.Images.Alttext$}}

Four people were killed and one critically injured when a swing stage on a building at 2757 Kipling Ave. failed. (Dec. 27, 2009)

CARLOS OSORIO/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO

A safety blitz held after the Christmas Eve deaths of four migrant workers led to the shutdown of 784 dangerous jobs on sites throughout Ontario.

The publicity surrounding the tragedy jolted the provincial government into action with a three-month safety audit of 2,800 sites across the province.

Results of the inspections, revealed Thursday, paint a troubling picture. Inspectors found problems at slightly more than half of the sites, including fall hazards, a lack of properly trained staff or supervisors and workers using broken or inadequate equipment.

Labour Minister Peter Fonseca called the numbers “unacceptable” and said the ministry will soon open up a 1-800 line for workers and members of the public to call if feel they’ve spotted a safety violation.

But Fonseca stopped short of committing to increase the number of trained construction inspectors in Ontario. He said that before making more profound changes, he’ll wait to hear from the special advisor who is leading a review of lax labour, workplace safety and enforcement laws in the wake of the Dec. 24 fatalities.

The four men fell 13 floors to their deaths at a Kipling Ave. apartment building when a scaffold snapped. Another man was seriously injured.

“We can do better and we will do better,” Fonseca said at a press conference in the lobby at the labour ministry’s University Ave. offices.

“It was those bad apples we targeted during this blitz – the ones who put workers at risk, the ones with poor safety records or histories of incidents or injuries. And those were the ones we shut down.”

During the campaign, ministry of labour inspectors issued 784 stop-work orders for fall-related hazards. The orders could remain in force indefinitely if safety standards are not met.

Including the stop-work orders, inspectors issued 3,421 work orders, or notices of safety violations, for fall-related hazards. More than half, or 56 per cent, were for problems related to missing or improper use or maintenance of guardrails, non-suspended scaffolds and fall protection systems.

The findings are “embarrassing” said Patrick Dillon, business manager of the Provincial Building and Construction Trades Council of Ontario. The council is an umbrella group that represents 150,000 construction workers.

Workers who raise safety concerns on the construction site should be rewarded and not penalized, Dillon said. “But what happens to the worker who raises the safety issue? They get laid off. There is a culture shift that needs to happen around that.”

NDP MPP Peter Kormos (Welland) said the 1-800 line “serious naïveté” on Fonseca’s part.

“If we are going to save workers’ lives or protect them from workplace death or injury, we have to increase the number of inspections, and they can’t be part of a blitz,” he said.

Rules must be enforceable not only through fines, but also through charges under the criminal code, he said.

Progressive Conservative MPP Randy Hillier (Lanark-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington) said the ministry is focused on the wrong aspects of health and safety.

“It’d be interesting to see how many hours were spent educating workers or how many hours of instruction were done,” he said. “They used to provide education and assistance and now they provide fines. To shut down 780 work sites, that tells me their education programs are woefully inadequate.”

Critics in the construction industry have said a tragedy such as the one that occurred on Christmas Eve was waiting to happen because of a lack of inspections and the emergence of an underground economy where safety is forsaken for cheap labour.

Since 1990, 405 construction workers have lost their lives on the job.

Fran DeFilippis lost her husband Naz on April 26, 2002, when he fell 18 floors down an elevator shaft of a luxury condominium under construction.

“Today my life has drastically changed. I’ve been forced into the roles of a mother and father, a financial advisor, a handyman, the list goes on,” she told reporters at the news conference.

“As for my children, they know the scars of death just a little bit too well.”

Many families have been cheated because of preventable workplace fatalities, she said.

“When I think of the number of victims suffering … I cannot begin to comprehend why things have not changed,” she said.

The safety inspection campaign was one of the longest and most extensive ever undertaken by the government. It concludes there is a woeful lack of supervisor and worker training, use of missing or broken equipment and poor use of guardrails on Ontario construction sites.

“These results indicate that safe work measures and procedures needed to keep workers safe were not in place,” the report said.


Wednesday, May 12, 2010

MSA's new EVOTECH Fall Protection Harness


We finally got in the new EVOTECH harness from MSA. This thing has obviously been designed to go toe-to-toe with Miller's Revoultion series and North's Rite-On and it does quite a good job. They've used some pretty advanced materials to ensure user comfort like porous mesh webbing so users don't sweat as much on hot days. It's also very water and dirt repellent. They've definitely paid a LOT of attention to detail here.

For an overview of features MSA has also come up with a pretty cool website to launch the product here. You may want to turn down your speakers if you're at work though (or turn them up if you're at late night rave party).

I believe they're also coming up with a 'camel-back' pouch for this thing to allow users to sip water or a hydration drink while working--very useful if you're a high-rise window washer who's up on a swing stage all day. This is isn't really highlighted on the demo though for some reason.

It doesn't have a hinges that the revolution has at the waist but I put it on and found it really comfortable. It's also adjustable in every way imaginable which adds to the overall comfort. I had no trouble moving, walking, bending etc.

COOL FEATURE: It's RFID enabled which is a new way of keeping inventory and tracking all items (going to slowly replace barcoding as the standard throughout industry I think). This allows each harness to have a unique identifier to make inspection and records of inspection much easier. This may be a little too early to implement this technology for a lot of end-users but I guess MSA wants to be on the cutting edge. No one else really does this yet I believe. I also think the cost is more or less negligible so it's probably a good idea. I hope users all catch on so MSA starts using this technology in all their products.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

The New York City Mandate

The New York City Mandate

No matter where you work, you need a plan for handling emergencies. NYC's Local Law 26 can guide you.

It was around 1609 that Henry Hudson mapped an area near the Atlantic Ocean and along the river that later bore his name on the eastern coast of the United States. It was incorporated as the City of New Amsterdam on Feb. 2, 1653. Once the British captured the city in 1664, they renamed it New York after the Duke of York and Albany, and the name stuck. New York is the most densely populated city in North America — 25,200 people per square mile. It is the financial capital of the United States, a symbol of America, which is why on Feb. 26, 1993, a truck full of explosives was detonated in the basement garage of the World Trade Center. That explosion killed six and injured 1,000 people.

Fast forward to Sept. 11, 2001, when two fully fueled trans-continental jet aircraft rammed the two towers, with a third plane hitting the Pentagon and a fourth jet crashing in a field in Somerset County, Pa., its target unknown. Before the attack, New York City required high-rise buildings to have:

  • Fire protection plans
  • Fire safety director to direct operations
  • Limited evacuations for small fires, fire floor and floor above
  • Evacuation wardens and searchers to help to ensure all people in the building were notified and evacuated as necessary.
After the attack, Congress passed a law (P.L. 107-306) that created a commission to determine the cause of the events of 9/11 and make recommendations to prevent its recurrence. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States held hearings, reviewed documents, and made recommendations.

Here's what happened to one company.

During the 1993 incident, it took one large banking company, Morgan Stanley, more than two hours to get all of its employees from the top of the tower, down the stairs, and out of the building as they followed their fire safety plan. That was unacceptable to Rick Rescorla, vice president for Security. He revised the evacuation plan. When the planes hit the building on 9/11, the employees followed the new plan and evacuated in about 45 minutes. Thirteen of the company's employees died in that tragedy, including Rescorla as he was helping others to evacuate. Because of all of this, the city knows that many companies in high-rise building offices are not fully prepared to handle any type of severe incident.

For those of us in the industrial sector, emergency planning is nothing new. Per 29 CFR 1910.38 and 1910.39, industrial facilities have had emergency plans and fire prevention plans in place for a long while — but how many non-industrial companies read the Code of Federal Regulations to know that?

Local Law 26

In 2004, New York City's Council passed Local Law 26 of 2004 (LL26), which added to the requirements of the fire safety plan by requiring an Emergency Action Plan (EAP). This new law became effective as of April 6, 2006, and required many things. Some had to be done retrospectively for all existing buildings; others were prospective, applying to all new buildings going up or being modified. The law became effective for all office buildings six stories or higher, 75 feet or taller, or occupied by more than 500 people.

The retrospective requirements:

  • Fully sprinklered buildings by 2019
  • All doors leading to exits and all exit stairs had to have photoluminescent markings by July 2006.
  • By July 2007, building owners had to add additional signs to indicate egress path directions if they were not clearly indicated by travel routes.
  • Also by July 2007, all exit signs required a backup power source (battery or generator).
They also put in prospective requirements that are now current for all newly designed buildings. Included in this section is the requirement to have an emergency action plan, as well as:
  • Floor drains in elevator shafts and vestibules
  • Fuel oil piping above the lowest floor
  • Impact-resistant stair and elevator enclosures
  • Inspection of existing fireproofing and fire dampers
  • Emergency Action Plan for evacuation
This is not the complete list. You can get additional details at http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/rcny_legal/rcny_final.shtml (look for 3 RCNY §6-02).

The law required specific details and the specific layout of each plan to make it easier for fire department personnel to review the thousands of plans that were submitted.

The types of disasters included:

  • Explosion: inside or outside of the building
  • Chemical disaster: fuel or gasoline leak, for example, or any other type of chemical
  • Biological disaster: anthrax or "white powder" incident, smallpox, flu
  • Nuclear or radiological disaster: dirty bomb
  • Natural disaster: flood, hurricane, or blizzard
  • Any other type of disaster, such as a power failure, defective elevator
For each of the above, a building's EAP had to detail how that building would handle shelter-in-place, in-building relocation, partial evacuation, and full evacuation.

Plan Development Process

I worked on developing five plans for buildings that ranged from 30 to 45 stories and included 1,400 to 4,500 people. To get started, a template of topics and section headings was developed that matched the requirements of the law. Building-specific details were then added to complete the plan.

This sounds simple, but that was only part of the project. With some of my co-workers, we canvassed each building, office by office, talking to the person in charge. We wanted to find out several things:

  • How many people worked in each office?
  • How much space did each office have, in the event they had to shelter in place?
  • Did the company have any emergency plans in place? If workers had to evacuate, where would they go? We had to indicate this in the plan and also a general area for those who did not have evacuation plans. (A fast-food restaurant two blocks away is open all night and can handle several hundred people.)
  • Did they have employees with special needs? Working along with us was a drafting company that was making detailed floor plans showing shelter-in-place locations, evacuation routes, warden phones, and other building features.

As we continued our interviews through the buildings, we provided the various companies with a flyer that told them about the law and what the plan would cover. It also told them mandatory evacuation drills would be required of all occupants. (Many of these tenants were financial and brokerage companies who had to be up and running during normal business hours when the stock market was functioning. They were not happy with that requirement.) We also reviewed building documents as to elevator coverage, where mechanical rooms were located, how the building's HVAC system operated, and whether it could handle a chemical release as well as a smoke condition.

One of the important pieces of information was the number and location of special-needs employees — employees who would need help during evacuation. In these cases, the employer had to assign two helpers for each employee, and we needed to include how the employee would be evacuated.

All plans were submitted and eventually approved by the fire department. Because this law was being enforced while plans were being submitted, the regulations being used to ensure compliance were changing. Several rewrites were necessary to ensure compliance with the regulatory changes.

Get Started

What does this mean to you? Whether you work in a high-rise office building, a chemical plant, or a manufacturing company, you need a plan for handling emergencies. OSHA does not say it must be written if you have fewer than 10 employees, but what are you going to tell your employees? It is better when written down.

What do you have on your shelf? Many of you already have some type of emergency plan, fire prevention plan, or contingency plan (such as for large-quantity hazardous waste generators). Follow the minimum requirements that are listed in the regulations (or your jurisdiction's requirements) and personalize the plan to fit your situation.

  • 29 CFR 1910.38 — Emergency Action Plan
  • 29 CFR 1910.39 — Fire Prevention Plan
  • 40 CFR 264.50 — Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures
When you develop your plan, keep your emergency priorities in mind. Those priorities are, in order, life safety, incident stabilization, and protection of property (FEMA, Incident Command System, IS-100).

What types of hazards can affect your operations? Make a list. Of those hazards, which ones can cause the most damage, and which ones occur more frequently? Prioritize that list. If you get hit with a hurricane, you might lose a roof — but hurricanes may occur once every 10 years in your area of the country, while you have power outages at least once a week every summer. What is the difference in financial losses associated with them?

Your plan should be user friendly. There is nothing as frustrating as having to flip pages trying to find information you know is in there, but it doesn't stick out.

  • Use separate sections for each procedure or emergency situation.
  • Use checklists to simplify tasks and notifications.
  • Use titles in procedures, not names.
  • Put names in an appendix at the end. When a name changes, this simplifies corrections.
  • Have a prioritized hazard list to work on so you work on developing plans for the most important hazard first. (It will be the one that hits while the plan is still in draft stages.)
  • Develop specific plans and procedures for your operations.
  • Publish to other managers and lead employees, asking for their comments.
  • Revise the plan.
  • Practice, train, drill, or run an exercise.
  • Revise the plan after use.
  • Keep it current!
Practice using the plan. Train employees in performing the procedures in the plan. Run a tabletop drill or a full-scale exercise. Revise as necessary and keep it current. NYC regulations require at least an annual update, but changes occurred more frequently as tenants and staff changed.

About the Author

Barry R. Weissman (regulatorymavin@yahoo.com), REM, CSP, CHMM*, CHS-V, CIPS, is EHS Manager for a Bio-Chemical Research Laboratory in New Jersey, a Registered Environmental Manager, a Certified Safety Professional, and a Certified Hazardous Materials Manager. He is Certified in Homeland Security at Advanced Level 5, is a Certified Infrastructure Preparedness Specialist, was recently elected Fellow of the Institute of Hazardous Materials Managers (www.ihmm.org). He is the moderator of RegulatoryPost, a Yahoo! Group providing regulatory updates, safety tips, and links to training materials. You can subscribe to RegulatoryPost by sending a blank e-mail to: RegulatoryPost-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. This article is dedicated to Richard Cyril "Rick" Rescorla, security director of Morgan Stanley; Roger Mark Rasweiler, CSP, a member of the New Jersey Chapter of the American Society of Safety Engineers; Richard Rodriguez, a police officer with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and a member of the Middlesex County Office of Emergency Management, and the 2,970 other victims of terrorism that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001.